Results
Title |
Author | Citation | Alternate Citation | Summary | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compromise & the Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare | Animal People (Editorial) | July/August 2005 p.3 |
This artlicle discusses the history of the Universal Declaration and recent attempts to modify the Declaration. |
Article | |
| Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Topic Area | Elizabeth Overcash |
Brief Summary of CAFOs (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations) and Animal Welfare
|
Topical Introduction | ||
| Concerned Dog Owners of California v. City of Los Angeles | 123 Cal.Rptr.3d 774 (Cal.App.2 Dist., 2011) | 194 Cal.App.4th 1219 (2011); 2011 WL 1601919 (Cal.App.2 Dist., 2011) |
Dog owners mounted a constitutional challenge to a Los Angeles municipal ordinance that required all dogs and cats within the city to be sterilized. The Court of Appeal held that the ordinance did not violate the owners’ freedom of association rights, free speech rights. or equal protection rights. The court held that it was not unconstitutionally vague, was not outside of the city's police powers, did not vest unfettered discretion in city officials, did not constitute an unconstitutional prior restraint or an unconstitutional taking. Finally, the law did not violate individual liberties under the California Constitution. |
Case | |
| Conference Summary: "The Moral and Legal Status of Non-Human Animals" | Portugal Center for Animal Law and Ethics | Center for Animal Law and Ethics, Portugal |
The document is a summary of each speaker's presentation at a Conference held at Lisbon University Law School. |
Article | |
| CONFINED TO A PROCESS: THE PREEMPTIVE STRIKE OF LIVESTOCK CARE STANDARDS BOARDS IN FARM ANIMAL WELFARE REGULATION | Lindsay Vick | 18 Animal L. 151 (2011) | In recent years, livestock care standards boards have emerged as an innovative way for state agencies to regulate farm animal welfare. Far from improving farm animal welfare, however, these boards are frequently a way to codify existing industry standards. The Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board, for example, had a nominal mission to establish regulations governing the care and well-being of livestock and poultry. Other states have created similar mechanisms for regulating farm animal welfare. This Comment maintains that the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board regulations merely codify the existing status quo on Ohio factory farms rather than improving the health and welfare of animals. This Comment also discusses the successes and failures of other livestock care standards boards. This Comment then considers ways that livestock care standards boards, or alternative methods, could improve farm animal welfare. | Article | |
| Confiscated night monkeys veterinary evaluation | Slideshow Images | ||||
| Conflicting Values: The Religious Killing of Federally Protected Wildlife | Tina S. Boradiansky | 30 NRJ 709 (1990) |
This Comment explores the current conflict between federal wildlife protection and Indian religious use of animals which reflects this philosophical debate. |
Article | |
| Confronting Barriers to the Courtroom for Animal Advocates | Delcianna J. Winders | 13 Animal Law 1 (2006) |
This article explores the historic and current barriers animal law advocates face in pursuing litigation on behalf of animal interests. |
Article | |
| Connecticut General Statutes 1902: Sections 2807-2816 | Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 2807 - 2816 (1902) | The 1902 General Statutes of Connecticut sections 2807-2816 cover the following topics: definition of an animal, powers of an agent from humane society, and funding of the humane society. | Statute | ||
| Connecticut General Statutes 1918: Chapter 329: Section 6268 | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 6268 (1918) | Section 6268 of Chapter 329 from the 1918 General Laws of Connecticut covers the unlawful injury to certain property of another. Specifically, the statute states the punishment for hurting, maiming, poisoning anther's cattle, ox, horse, and mule. | Statute |
