Research Animals

Displaying 121 - 130 of 144
Titlesort descending Summary
TX - Adoption - Sec. 552.1177 Exception Confidentiality of Certain Information Related to Humane Disposition of Animal. This provision in the Texas Public Information Act protects the personally identifying information of individuals who adopt, foster, or take ownership of animals through a county or municipal facility.
U.S. ex rel. Haight v. Catholic Healthcare West


The plaintiffs, In Defense of Animals and Patricia Haight brought suit against the defendants under the False Claims Act.  In 1997, defendant Michael Berens, Ph.D., submitted a grant application to the NIH in which he sought federal funding for a project to develop a canine model to study glioma, a form of human brain cancer, and attempted to create a process for implanting gliomas in the brains of beagles. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, holding that the plaintiffs failed to produce sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that the challenged grant application statements were objectively false. 

U.S. ex rel. Haight v. Catholic Healthcare West


The plaintiffs, In Defense of Animals and Patricia Haight brought suit against the defendants, Michael Berens, the principal research investigator of the study in question, and the Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Catholic Healthcare West Arizona, and Catholic Healthcare West, his employers, under the False Claims Act.  In 1997, defendant Michael Berens, Ph.D., submitted a grant application to the NIH in which he sought federal funding for a project to develop a canine model to study glioma, a form of human brain cancer, and attempted to

create a process for implanting gliomas in the brains of beagles. The plaintiffs brought suit against Dr. Berens under the False Claims Act asserting that he had lied in his grant application in order to obtain NIH funding. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, holding that the plaintiffs failed to produce sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that the challenged grant application statements were objectively false.

 

In response, the plaintiffs filed a notice to appeal 51 days later, relying on a circuit court precedent allowing plaintiffs 60 days to file a notice of appeal in these types of cases.

 

However, an intervening Supreme Court decision declared that plaintiffs have only 30 days to file a notice to appeal in this type of case.

 

This case was amended and superseded by


US ex rel Haight v. Catholic Healthcare West

, 602 F.3d 949 (9th Cir., 2010).




Uganda - Cruelty - Chapter 220 Animal Act
UK - Research Animals - Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986
UK - Research Animals - The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012
US - AWA - Animal Welfare Act The AWA is, in the main, a regulatory law that seeks to control who may possess or sell certain animals and the living conditions (for non-agricultural, domestic animals) under which the animals must be kept. The law provides for criminal penalties, civil penalties and revocation of permits for violations of the AWA.
US - AWA - Part 2. Regulations. Subparts A to I This set of the regulations sets out the requirements and process for licensing and registration of dealers, exhibitors and research facilities.
US - AWA - Senate Report on 1966 Animal Welfare Act


The Committee on Commerce, to which was referred the bill (H.R. 13881) to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to regulate the transportation, sale, and handling of dogs and cats intended to be used for purposes of research or experimentation, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon with amendments and recommends that the bill as amended do pass.

US - Chimpanzees - Research

Pages