Research Animals
Displaying 101 - 110 of 139
Title![]() |
Summary |
---|---|
PETA's Investigation of Caucaseco Scientific Research Center in Cali, Colombia | Developments and relevant legal materials concerning PETA's investigation into the irregularities and welfare conditions of primates used by the NIH-funded Caucaseco Scientific Research Center, A Colombian institution dedicated to scientific research for the development of a malaria vaccine. |
PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL RESEARCH: REPLACEMENT, REDUCTION, REFINEMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITY | |
Protocol on Animal Welfare Under Amsterdam Treaty |
|
PROTOCOLO RELATIVO À PROTECÇÃO E AO BEM-ESTAR DOS ANIMAIS |
|
RI - Education - § 16-22-20. Animal dissection and vivisection--Right to refuse--Alternate learning project required | This Rhode Island law provides that parents or legal guardians of any student in a public or nonpublic primary or secondary school may refuse to allow their child to dissect or vivisect any vertebrate or invertebrate animal, or any part of a vertebrate or invertebrate animal. Students who refuse shall not be discriminated against for not participating in dissection and shall be offered an alternative method of learning the material. |
RI - Research - Chapter 27. Retirement of Research Dogs and Cats | This chapter, adopted in 2018, is the “Research Animal Retirement Act." A higher education research facility that receives public money must assess the health of a cat or dog to determine whether it is suitable for adoption once any testing or research on the animal has been completed. The facility must then make reasonable efforts to place those suitable dogs or cats through private adoption or adoption through a shelter or rescue. These efforts shall be made prior to euthanizing the dog or cat. |
Secretary of State for The Home Office v. BUAV and the Information Commissioner |
Appeal concerning the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and experiments involving animals. The BUAV had made an information request in respect of five research project licenses issued under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. The Home Office released limited summary information, relying on exemptions under FOIA to reason this; namely under section 24(1) which would prohibit information from being disclosed that had been given “in confidence.” The Court of Appeal upheld the decision that the Home Office was entitled to refuse BUAV’s information request. |
SOME THOUGHTS ON ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION | |
Some Thoughts on Animal Experimentation |
|
South Africa - Biological Diversity - Regulations |