Results
Displaying 3241 - 3250 of 6844
|
Title |
Author | Citation | Summary | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Aspects of Animal Sacrifice Within the Context of Afro-Caribbean Religions | Jose A. Lammoglia | 20 St. Thomas L. Rev. 710 |
This article explores the legal issues surrounding animal sacrifice in the Afro-Caribbean Belief Systems (religions such as Cuban Santeria, Palo, and Haitian Voodoo). The author examines cases in Florida, Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania in making the argument that misconceptions concerning animal sacrifice and religious prejudice often fuels the controversies. |
Article |
| Legal Challenges to Farm Animal Welfare Laws | Alexis Andrews |
Brief Summary of Legal Challenges to Farm Animal Welfare Laws |
Topical Introduction | |
| Legal Framework of Bullfighting and Societal Context in Colombia | Angie Vega | Animal Legal & Historical Center | This essay provides an overview of the current situation and the legal framework regarding bullfighting in Colombia. The Spanish conquest of Latin America dramatically transformed cultural practices. Spanish heritage was brought with the colonization of the South American countries and with it the cultural practices of bullfighting that carries a strong element of tradition in the Hispanic culture. The evolution of laws and court decisions regarding bullfighting have been dramatically altered in recent years. Today, the position of the Colombian Constitutional Court is aimed at the abolishment of the practice. However, the Colombian Congress’ position regarding bullfighting is not as clear. Tradition has been one of the main arguments in the justification of bullfighting. However, it is important to understand that the current debate focuses on whether bullfighting should be regulated or abolished. | Article |
| LEGAL IMPACT FOR CHICKENS RULING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS'DEMURRER | This document comprises Defendant Alexandre Family Farm's demurrer to Plaintiff Legal Impact for Chickens complaint. Plaintiff alleges two causes of action against the defendant Alexandre Family LLC and three individuals. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief under Corporations Code section 10404 and declaratory and injunctive relief under section 145011. Plaintiff alleges that Alexandre violated California's animal anti-cruelty laws in Penal Code sections 597 et seq. as well as industry standards for treatment of farm animals. The Court concluded that the complaint alleged sufficient facts to demonstrate the court's jurisdiction over the dispute. as well as standing of the plaintiff, and a cause of action for injunctive and declaratory relief under Corporations Code sections 10404and 1450 was established. | Pleading | ||
| Legal Impact for Chickens v. Case Farms, L.L.C. | --- S.E.2d ----, 2025 WL 1450006 (N.C. Ct. App. May 21, 2025) | This case examined whether Defendants' commercial poultry operations—including hatching, transporting, and slaughtering chickens—fell under exemptions in North Carolina's Protection of Animals Act (PAA). Plaintiff, an animal advocacy group, alleged Defendants subjected chickens to cruel treatment, such as starvation, crushing, overheating, and boiling alive, violating the PAA's prohibition on unjustifiable suffering. The appellate court affirmed dismissal, holding that the PAA's exemptions for "lawful activities conducted for the production of poultry" and "providing food for human or animal consumption" shielded Defendants' entire operation, not just isolated steps in the process. The court rejected Plaintiff's argument that each stage of production should be scrutinized individually, ruling instead that the statute's plain language protected lawful commercial farming as a whole. Because Plaintiff failed to allege Defendants' overarching business was unlawful, the court upheld the dismissal, thereby reinforcing agricultural exemptions in animal cruelty statutes and affirming the trial court's order. | Case | |
| Legal Impact for Chickens v. Case Farms, LLC | This reflects Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Request for Injunctive Relief. In a press release, Plaintiff Legal Impact for Chickens states, "[t]oday, one of the country’s largest poultry producers and a KFC supplier, Case Farms, was sued by animal-welfare charity Legal Impact for Chickens (LIC) in Burke County District Court for its pattern of gross mismanagement and animal cruelty. The complaint comes on the heels of a 2021 undercover investigation by animal advocacy group Animal Outlook, revealing a trend of cruel and deadly abuse at a Morganton, N.C. Case Farms hatchery that processes more than 200,000 chicks daily. LIC accuses Case Farms of violating both industry standards and North Carolina law." | Pleading | ||
| Legal Implications of Dolphin and Human Interactions | Ann Linder |
Brief Summary of the Legal Implications of Dolphin and Human Interactions |
Topical Introduction | |
| Legal materials investigation Research Center- materials | Relevant legal documents concerning investigation into the cruel treatment of animals at the Malaria Research Center in Cali, Colombia. | Policy | ||
| LEGAL PERSONHOOD AND THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT | Steven M. Wise | 17 Animal L. 1 (2010) |
The author gives an overview of the progress of the Nonhuman Rights Project. |
Article |
| Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn |
|
Policy |
