United States
Title | Summary |
---|---|
Stanko v. Maher |
A livestock owner and drover sued the Wyoming state brand inspector, alleging that inspector violated his state and federal constitutional rights in making warrantless seizure of five head of livestock, and that inspector abused his office in violation of state constitution. Plaintiff Rudy Stanko, proceeding pro se, appealed from the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendant Jim Maher. The appellate court affirmed the entry of summary judgment in favor of Mr. Maher, holding that the warrantless search of cattle did not violate Fourth Amendment and the inspector did not violate the Fourth Amendment by making warrantless seizure of cattle as estrays. Further, the procedure provided under Wyoming brand inspection statutes prior to seizure of cattle deemed to be estrays satisfied due process requirements. |
Stanton v. State |
|
State and Federal Disaster Planning Laws and Pets | |
State and Local Dog Laws | |
STATE ANIMAL ANTI-CRUELTY STATUTES: AN OVERVIEW | |
STATE ANIMAL USE PROTECTION STATUTES: AN OVERVIEW | |
State Anti-Cruelty Laws | |
State Ballot Proposals, Initiatives, and Referendums | |
State Endangered Species Chart |
|
State ex rel Del Monto v. Woodmansee |
|