Health
Title![]() |
Summary |
---|---|
AR - Veterinary - Veterinary Practice Code | These are the state's veterinary practice laws. Among the provisions include licensing requirements, laws concerning the state veterinary board, veterinary records laws, and the laws governing disciplinary actions for impaired or incompetent practitioners. |
Argentina - Farm animals - Ley 27233, 2015 | |
Argentina - Health - Ley Nº 23.899, 1990 | |
AZ - Dog - Arizona Consolidated Dog Laws | These Arizona statutes comprise the laws relating to dogs and animal bites. Included are provisions related to registration, collaring, and vaccination of dogs. With regard to dangerous dogs, Arizona law provides that a person with knowledge of a dog's vicious propensity must also keep the dog in an enclosed yard or confined area with a sign indicating the dog's vicious tendencies. |
AZ - Health - § 36-2230. Ambulance services; police dogs; authorization; policies and procedures; immunity; billing | Under this 2023 Arizona law, each ambulance service shall require its emergency medical care technicians and ambulance attendants to transport a police dog that is injured in the line of duty, along with a trained police officer by a ground ambulance or another emergency medical services vehicle to a veterinary clinic or veterinary hospital equipped to provide emergency treatment to dogs. This is only allowed if all criteria listed in the law are met, including the fact that a person is not requiring emergency medical treatment or transport by the ambulance. |
AZ - Ordinances - Article 2. Board of Trustees Government After Disincorporation. | §§ 9-211 to 9-226. Repealed by Laws 2016, Ch. 62, § 9, eff. Jan. 1, 2017 (related to powers of the board of trustees) |
Biological Information on the Asiatic Black Bear |
|
Bormaster v. Henderson |
|
Boss v. State |
Defendant appealed her convictions of misdemeanor failure to restrain a dog and misdemeanor harboring a non-immunized dog after her dogs attacked a neighbor and a witness to the incident causing serious injury to both parties. Evidence supported her convictions for failure to restrain dogs because her fence had gaps through which the dogs could escape, and another dog was wearing only a loose collar. Evidence supported her convictions for harboring dogs that had not been immunized against rabies because she did not show proof that dogs had been immunized, which supported inferences that she was aware of the high probability that the dogs had not been immunized, and therefore, she knowingly harbored non-immunized dogs. |
Brief Summary of Bear Farming and the Trade in Bear Bile |
|