Results
Displaying 11 - 20 of 29
Title | Citation | Summary | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Revista Brasileira de Direito Animal Volume 14 |
SUMÁRIOEDITORIALHeron José de Santana Gordilho………………………………………………. |
Policy | |
SuiÁa | impetraram este HABEAS CORPUS REPRESSIVO, em favor da chimpanzÈ "SuiÁa" (nome cientifico anthropopithecus troglodytes), macaca que se encontra enjaulada no Parque Zoobot‚nico Get˙lio Vargas (Jardim ZoolÛgico de Salvador), situado na Av. Ademar de Barros | Case | |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Animal Volume 16 |
SUMÁRIOEDITORIALHeron Santana Gordilho ………………………………………………. |
Policy | |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Animal Volume 13 |
SUMÁRIOEDITORIAL Heron José de Santana Gordilho DOUTRINA INTERNACIONAL/INTERNATIONAL ARTICLES1. PORQUE É CRIME ESMAGAR UM PEIXINHO DOURADO?: DANO, VÍTIMA E A ESTRUTURA DOS CRIMES ANTI-CRUELDADE |
Policy | |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Animal Volume 18 |
SUMÁRIOEDITORIAL Heron Gordilho............... Direito Animal Comparado/Comparative Animal Law |
Policy | |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Animal Volume 11 |
Sumário / Table of Contents
|
Policy | |
Brazil - Crimes - Brazilian Environmental Crimes Law | Law 9, 605 (Feb 12, 1998) |
This law of Brazil seeks to protect wildlife and plants of the country, particularly endangered species. |
Statute |
Brazil's ban on live cattle exports | 5000325-94.2017.4.03.6135 | This is the case in which a court in Brazil banned live cattle exports from all Brazilian ports based on animal welfare concerns. It is the result of a lawsuit filed by the NGO "Foro Nacional para la Protección y Defensa de los Animales," who requested that this type of animal transport to be banned. In 2018, the court granted a temporary injunction prohibiting live cattle exports. However, this injunction was invalidated by a superior tribunal. In her opinion, the judge stated that "animals are not things. They are sentient living beings—individuals who feel hunger, thirst, pain, cold, anguish, and fear. " In its holding, the judge compares the treatment of animals to the treatment suffered by humans during the slave trade, stating that non-human animals suffer the same treatment in the name of commercial development. Furthermore, the judge concluded that the necessary methods to guarantee the health and well-being of animals in this type of transport were not being adopted and urged for the harmonization between the interests of human animals (economic interest or interest in providing food for the population) with the ethics that must preside over their relations with non-human animals, encouraging the country to be at the forefront in abolishing inappropriate handling and eradicating all types of cruelty against animals. Even though this is a landmark decision, it is important to mention that this is not a final decision constituting legal precedent, and a higher court can invalidate it if it is appealed. | Case |
Brazil - Constitutional Provision - Animal | TITLE Vlll, CHAP. VI, ART. 225 |
Article 8 of the Constitution provides for legal concern about animals.(See, VII. of Paragraph 1.) |
Statute |
The Convention on Biological Diversity in Portuguese |
A Convençno da Biodiversidade foi assinada no Rio de Janeiro em 1992, por 156 Estados e uma organizaçno de integraçno econômica regional. No período de 5 a 14 de junho de 1992. |
Treaty |