Results
| Title |
Author |
Citation | Summary | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal Rights Cause Gains Credibility | Al Johnson | 1 Animal L. 11 (1995) | The author compares John Stuart Mill's social movement theory to the animal rights movement. | Article |
| 2014 State Legislative Review | Aaron C. Johnson | 21 Animal L. 383 (2015) | This article provides a review of significant state animal-related legislation from 2014. | Article |
| Brief Summary of Wildlife Rehabilitation Laws | Angela Nicole Johnson | Animal Legal & Historical Center |
This article presents a brief summary of the laws affecting wildlife rehabilitators. Wildlife rehabilitators care for orphaned and/or injured wildlife with the goal of returning animals back into their native habitat. Although a rehabilitator’s focus is on the care of wildlife, rehabilitators necessarily spend time complying with local, state, and federal laws, fundraising activities, coordinating volunteers, and educating the public about wildlife. |
Article |
| Wildlife Rehabilitation | Angela Nicole Johnson |
Brief Summary of Wildlife Rehabilitation Laws
|
Topical Introduction | |
| From Factory Farming to A Sustainable Food System: A Legislative Approach | Michelle Johnson-Weider | 32 Geo. Envtl. L. Rev. 685 (2020) | This Article explores the true costs of widespread industrialized agricultural practices in the United States (“U.S.”), particularly the most egregious of those practices—concentrated animal feeding operations (“CAFOs”). For nearly a hundred years, the United States has used federal policy and taxpayer dollars to support agricultural practices focused on high yields and cheap animal-based protein. As a result, the United States is reaping a harvest of toxicity: drinking water contaminated with cancer-causing nitrates and cyanobacteria, untreated animal sewage flooding across watersheds and adulterating crops, and dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico and the Chesapeake Bay that cost state fishing and tourism industries hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenues. Society picks up the true cost of “cheap meat” while industrialized agriculture thrives in a seemingly endless stream of federal support. It is long past time for a change. This Article proposes legislation that would leverage the power of the federal government to promote sustainable agricultural practices to reduce and eventually reverse the devastating health, economic, and environmental impacts of industrialized agricultural production. | Article |
| Overview of Breed Specific Legislation | Anna Jones | Animal Legal & Historical Center |
A breed ban, also known as breed specific legislation or “BSL” are all names for an ordinance that restricts ownership or possession of certain identified breeds of dogs. |
Article |
| Dealing Dogs: Can We Strengthen Weak Laws in the Dog Industry? | Sandra K. Jones | 7 Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 442 (Spring, 2010) |
The aim of this note has been to make a contribution to the awareness of the legal status of companion animals, specifically dogs. Currently, federal laws that govern man's best friend are archaic and lack fundamental protections for dogs. The relevant law has not evolved with the rest of society and fails to recognize that dogs need greater federal protection. The lack of protection is exemplified by the gaping loophole in the Animal Welfare Act, which leads to the exploitation of dogs by puppy mills and pet shops that only consider human profit at the expense of animal welfare. |
Article |
| Brief Summary of Breed Specific Legislation | Anna Jones | Animal Legal & Historical Center |
Breed Specific Legislation or “BSL” is a law that either bans or restricts ownership of certain dogs based on their appearance. |
Article |
| Detailed Discussion of Breed Specific Legislation | Anna Jones | Animal Legal & Historical Center | This paper first examines the anatomy of a typical breed ban and outlines which dogs are restricted and what tests are used to identify them. Next, it explores the history of breed bans and their introduction into modern society – focusing in particular on the 1980’s media coverage of fatal dog attacks that spread fear and fueled the passage of BSL. The paper finally considers the current status of breed specific legislation. | Article |
| Restricting the Use of Animal Traps in the United States: An Overview of Laws and Strategy | Dena M. Jones & Sheila Hughes Rodriguez | 9 Animal L. 136 (2003) |
Enacting absolute bans on the use of trapping devices and on commerce in trapped animal products has been difficult. Nearly every state, however, has enacted some restrictions on who can trap, what animals can be trapped, where and when animals can be trapped, the type and size of permitted traps, and how often traps must be checked. This article summarizes past and potential approaches to curtail the use of traps in the U.S. at federal, state and local levels. The article also notes litigation related to trapping and trapping prohibitions. |
Article |
