Trade
Title | Summary |
---|---|
United States v. Kum |
|
United States of America v. James and Thomas Allemand |
|
UK - Wildlife Trade - Ivory Act 2018 | |
U.S. v. Paluch (unpublished) |
|
U.S. v. Molt |
Defendant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania of knowingly importing Fijian reptiles contrary to the Tariff Act and of conspiring to commit such offense. On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain finding of knowing importation and of receiving and concealing illegally imported reptiles. |
U.S. v. Lewis |
|
U.S. v. Bengis |
|
U.S. v. 2,507 Live Canary Winged Parakeets |
|
U.S. IVORY TRADE: CAN A CRACKDOWN ON TRAFFICKING SAVE THE LAST TITAN? | |
TX - Trade - Shark Fins | Effective July 1, 2106: a person may not buy or offer to buy, sell or offer to sell, possess for the purpose of sale, transport, or ship for the purpose of sale, barter, or exchange a shark fin regardless of where the shark was taken or caught. A person who violates Section 66.2161 or a proclamation adopted under that section commits an offense that is a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor. |