Results
Displaying 1691 - 1700 of 6844
Title |
Citation | Summary | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Report 00022-2018-AI, 2020 - Peru | 00022-2018-AI | This report discussed issues of constitutionality against Law 30407, which allows for cockfighting and bullfighting in the name of cultural character. | Case |
| Decision STL12651-2017 | Decision STL12651-2017 | The Labor Cassation Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice decided on an action of ‘tutela’ filed by la Fundación Botánica y Zoológica de Barranquilla, Fundazoo against the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court, Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado, Corpocaldas and others. The Plaintiffs argued that the Defendants had violated their rights to due process and right to defense, as well as the principle of legality and contradiction, when the Defendant ordered the transfer of the spectacled bear ‘Chucho’ from the Barranquilla zoo to a natural reserve in Narino. Plaintiff sought to leave without effect Decision AHC4806 2017 that granted habeas corpus to ‘Chucho’, the spectacled bear, allowing the bear to stay at the Barranquilla Zoo, which according to Plaintiffs, is able to provide Chucho with all the requirements for his well being, including veterinary care, food, companionship and infrastructure. The Labor Chamber decided for the Plaintiff and left without effect the decision of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court, arguing that the Civil Chamber had ruled based on norms that did not apply to the specific case, to a point that the effects of such application had resulted in an interpretation that completely deferred to what the legislative had intended. The Civil Chamber, the court said in its reasoning, wrongly applied the procedure of habeas corpus, which led to the violation of the due process of law of the Plaintiffs, as ‘Chucho’ has no legal capacity to be a party in a legal procedure. The labor chamber explained that from a constitutional view, the granting of habeas corpus for the protection of animals was not proper, as it is established to protect the right to freedom of persons, which is the basis for a society. For that reason, it can only be attributable to human beings that can be individualized. This rules out the other beings to use this mechanism, including legal persons, as it would erode the real essence of this legal mechanism, the court stated. Furthermore, the magister judge states that the legal treatment that has been given to animals corresponds to the sentients beings, which implies their protection, rather than persons. This means that humans have the responsibility to respect animals, but does not imply that animals can fight for their freedom through the mechanism of habeas corpus, in these cases the defense of animals cannot be resolved by giving them the status of persons, but rather through judicial mechanisms such as popular actions (for the protection of collective and diffuse rights and interests), or with preventive material apprehension | Case |
| Decree 133, 2025, allowing live exports in Argentina - DO. NOT PUBLISH YET | Statute | ||
| Decree of March 18, 2025 prohibiting violent bullfights in Mexico City (Mexico) | Statute | ||
| Decreto Supremo 001-2017-MIMP, 2017 - Peru | 001-2017-MIMP | Esta ley pretende regular y promover el uso de perros guía para discapacitados visuales, incluyendo la atención veterinaria a los perros, la certificación y registro de su condición de perro guía, el adiestramiento y las condiciones de uso. | Statute |
| Decreto Supremo 004, 2014 - Peru | Decreto Supremo 004, 2014 | Esta ley aprueba la lista actualizada de categorización y clasificación de las especies de animales salvajes legalmente protegidas en las siguientes categorías: en peligro crítico, en peligro, vulnerable, casi amenazada y con datos insuficientes. Describe las normas y prohibiciones relativas a las actividades relacionadas con las especies en peligro, así como las normas relativas a la exportación de dichos animales con fines culturales o científicos. | Statute |
| Decreto Supremo 004-2019-MC, 2019 - Peru | Decreto Supremo 004-2019-MC, 2019 | Esta ley tiene como objetivo regular los criterios para evaluar si un evento público puede ser considerado, o "califica", como evento cultural no deportivo. Entre los eventos que pueden entrar en esta categoría se encuentran, entre otros, la ópera, el ballet, el teatro y el circo. La ley modifica la Ley 30870, que establecía los criterios para evaluar si un espectáculo puede considerarse un acontecimiento cultural no deportivo. En lo que respecta específicamente a el derecho animal, la ley establece que los mensajes y las acciones del evento no deben incitar al odio o la violencia contra los animales u otros seres vivos no humanos. | Statute |
| Decreto Supremo 006-2002-SA - Peru (2002) | Decreto Supremo 006-2002-SA | Este decreto aprueba la Ley 27596, Ley Reguladora del Régimen de los Perros, y todas las partes que la componen. A continuación, la ley proporciona el texto de la ley y sus secciones relativas a la propiedad, las sanciones, el cuidado y otros temas relacionados. | Statute |
| Decreto Supremo 007-2021, 2021 - Peru (2021) | Decreto Supremo 007-2021, 2021 - Peru | El objeto de esta ley es describir una serie de infracciones y sanciones en materia forestal y de fauna silvestre. Establece quiénes pueden sancionar a quienes infrinjan una norma y garantiza la potestad sancionadora a las administraciones competentes. La ley busca proteger los principios de las Leyes 28763, 27444 y demás normas aplicables en materia de protección y conservación de la materia forestal y de fauna silvestre. | Statute |
| Decreto Supremo 011-84-AG, 1984 - Peru | 011-84-AG | Esta ley considera necesario promover la cría de ganado de lidia como interés nacional. | Statute |