Full Case Name:  Writ of habeas corpus, Sandai

Share |
Country of Origin:  Chile Court Name:  Corte Suprema de Chile Primary Citation:  Corte Suprema Rol N°50.969-22 Date of Decision:  Saturday, October 8, 2022 Judge Name:  Haroldo Osvaldo Brito Cruz Judges:  Jorge Gonzalo Dahm Oyarzun Leopoldo Andres Llanos Sagrista Attorneys:  Fundación Justicia Interespecie; Diego Plaza
Summary: In July 2022, the Interspecies Justice Foundation filed the first writ of habeas corpus for a non-human animal in Chile. The petition urged the court to recognize Sandai, a 28-year-old orangutan to be recognized as a non-human person and subject of rights, and therefore, to end his captivity in Buin Zoo in Chile. The plaintiff argued that Sandai lived in conditions unfit for his species. One of the expert testimonies submitted to the court stated that “Sandai’s body language reflects a depressed, defeated, and vulnerable emotional and psychological state, which is normal if we consider the conditions in which Sandai is being kept.” The Chilean Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower court denying the admissibility of the habeas corpus filed on behalf of Sandai. In dismissing the appeal, the court stated that the constitution in its article 19 refers to persons and that in accordance with the Royal Spanish Academy, persons are individuals of the human species. Therefore, Sandai does not meet the legal requirements to be protected under this legal mechanism. Thus, upholding the decision of the Court of Appeals of San Miguel on July 27. Furthermore, with the purpose of protecting the well-being of Sandai, the Supreme Court ordered the Livestock Service (SAG) to adopt all appropriate measures to guarantee that the Buin Zoo complies with the law, specifically attending to Sandai’s case, stating: “that the deprivation of his liberty does not cause him suffering and any other alteration of its normal development, verifying that they have the appropriate facilities for his species, avoiding all mistreatment and deterioration of his health”.
Documents:  PDF icon SANDAI_Rol N°50.969-22.pdf (132.33 KB) PDF icon San-Miguel-Sandai-lower-court-decision.pdf (93.1 KB)
Share |