Full Title Name:  International Animal Rights: Specieism and Exclusionary Human Dignity

Share |
Kyle Ash Place of Publication:  Animal Law Review at Lewis & Clark School of Law Publish Year:  2005 Primary Citation:  11 Animal L. 195 (2005)

The primary goal of this paper is to act as a heuristic device, to suggest an unconventional but practical perspective on the evolution of international law. Upon surveying discourse on the history of international law, texts of treaties, and declarations and writings of influential philosophers of law and morality, an antiquated perspective of humanity is apparent. A convention in international law, and a reflection of a common idea which feeds the foreboding trend of how humans relate to the planet, treats humanity as distinctively separate from the Earth’s biodiversity. Though environmental law is beginning to recognize the necessity of conserving biodiversity, a subjugating conceptualization of other species has inhibited the development, application, and legitimacy of the principle of sustainability. The belittling view of other species in relation to ourselves also creates inconsistencies within international law and undermines the integrity and sophistication of its development. International human rights law is especially affected.

Documents:  PDF icon vol11_p195.pdf (101.91 KB)
Share |