Statute in Full:
Held Unconstitutional by
City of Boerne v. Flores, 117 S.Ct. 2157, 2158+, 521 U.S. 507, 507+, 138 L.Ed.2d 624, 624+, 65 USLW 4612, 4612+, 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 62, 62+, 70 Empl
§ 2000bb-1. Free exercise of religion protected
Current through P.L. 107-185, approved 5-30-02 (except P.L. 107-171)
(a) In general
Government shall not substantially burden a person's exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
Government may substantially burden a person's exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person--
(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and
(2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.
(c) Judicial relief
A person whose religious exercise has been burdened in violation of this section may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding and obtain appropriate relief against a government. Standing to assert a claim or defense under this section shall be governed by the general rules of standing under article III of the Constitution.
(Pub.L. 103-141, § 3, Nov. 16, 1993, 107 Stat. 1488.)